Ovi -
we cover every issue
Stop human trafficking  
Ovi Bookshop - Free Ebook
Join Ovi in Facebook
Ovi Language
Books by Avgi Meleti
The Breast Cancer Site
Murray Hunter: Opportunity, Strategy and Entrepreneurship
International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
BBC News :   - 
iBite :   - 
Freedom and Globalization: Simultaneously Possible
by Prof. Michael R. Czinkota
2016-12-06 11:53:38
Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author
DeliciousRedditFacebookDigg! StumbleUpon

Freedom and Globalization: Simultaneously Possible
Prof. Dr. Michael Czinkota and Dr. Valbona Zeneli

Globalization, trade and investment deserve our ”Thank You” for their achievements. Yes, currently, in Europe and the United States, popular discontent is forcefully expressed. An introvert trend has emerged, fed by nationalism, populism, xenophobia and anti-globalization rhetoric.

global01_400Globalization is not new; it has existed for centuries. What is different today is the speed of globalizing the world, made possible by new technologies, transportation networks, media, and international marketing. Many claim that never before in history has there been so much evidence about strong opposition to globalization. However, any comparison with the past is highly inaccurate. Only few records of resistance to globalization have been preserved for us today.

One main feature of globalization in our age is the conveyance of freedom, which in turn becomes the foundation of the good life. There are three dimensions to this freedom. For one, the opportunity to collaborate with others, to streamline processes and procedures and to increase the variety of products and services causes great freedom of choice. There is the freedom conveyed by sovereignty, where nations and their governments maintain and exercise preferences for their citizens. Individual countries will always seek to have sovereign freedom. Then there is the freedom of principles and options.  Such freedom of choice is primarily expressed by the recourse to deeply rooted principles which provide the boundaries of the playing field. If there is no limitation and no alternative, then there is no freedom. A true alternative requires a decision and the exercise of virtue. If there are no principles to which one can seek recourse, there is no freedom.

In reciprocal causality, freedom both causes and facilitates international marketing, while international marketing is a key support of the cause of freedom. The focus and aim of international marketing is on crossing borders, with the goal of providing more choice for consumers and letting them be the ones to maximize their satisfaction. International marketing does so in all corners of the globe, the glamorous ones as well as in the small and remote ones where its efforts not seen by others.

When the long-standing rivalry between socialism and market economy came to an end, market forces directly improved human rights and the extent of freedom. Exchanges trough markets have clearly demonstrated greater efficiency and effectiveness in their ability to satisfy the needs of people. Now they must demonstrate their ability to persist through continuity and balance.

In spite of complaints about slowness of change, biases in wealth distribution, and economic disparities and inequalities, a majority of the participants in market-oriented conditions are now better off than they were before. World poverty has been reduced significantly. Only 25 years ago, almost 2 billion people, 43 percent of the world population lived in extreme poverty with less than USD 1 a day. Today, the poor have been reduced to 700 million people, or 9.6 percent of the world population that live with less than USD 1,9 a day. Research shows that globalizing developing countries grew 3,5 faster than non-globalizing ones, over the last decades. Average incomes per capita have more than doubled in the last 25 years, from USD 4,192 in 1990 to USD 10,433 in 2015, and have increased 13 times from the 1970s, when they had an average income of USD 802.

One of the main discontents of globalization are low incomes in formerly successful regions, a high level of inequality within and between countries, and between the world´s economic classes. Such glaring inequality will not be tolerated anymore by people at large.

One key dimension of freedom is to allow people outside the box. National borders are where business, government and people usually find their limits. Freedom knows no international boundaries. It thrives on how to successfully cross national borders, on coping with local differences once the crossing is done, and on profitably reconciling any conflicts. Domestic borders limit economic expansion, while international approaches contain the freedom of much wider opportunities.

International activities encourage people all around the world. The anti- globalization narrative in Western European and the United States is caused by imbalances in both people and goods, as well as an intransigent enforcement of rules from disconnected centers. Migration and refugee pressures force people to move from rural homes into urban areas, from their developing countries into industrialized ones, and to take any measure to be relieved of wartime conditions. For both sides, little freedom is involved here. Most individuals who do the moving would much rather stay home but cannot afford to do so. The recipient countries might not want to welcome the refugees and migrants but have to do so in response to humanitarian pressures.

Globalization may have been part of what triggered some of these shifts and migrations, but it also can be instrumental in restoring the freedom to stem the tide. Globalization can provide economic opportunity and alternatives for individuals in their home countries, free from pressures to shift locations, so they can become productive economic contributors. To make globalization work, governmental, managerial, and corporate virtue, vision, and veracity are required. Trading and investment partners need to understand the current context and longer term effect of policy and business actions taken. Joint actions  based on mutual interests but also accepting divergent interests will make better outcomes not just possible but likely. 


Doctor Valbona Zeneli is a professor of national security studies at the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies. She is an economist with an interest in international economics, good governance and international security.

Professor Michael Czinkota was a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for international trade. He teaches international marketing at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business in Washington D.C and at University of Kent in Canterbury, England. His key book is International Marketing, 10th ed., CENGAGE.

Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author

Get it off your chest
 (comments policy)

Emanuel Paparella2016-12-06 12:37:07
Interesting! As Einstein put it: you cannot solve the problems caused by technology with more technology. You will remain in the box forever. May be the people with their discontent (we have seen it in the Italy referendum lately) know something that the pundits still don't get. Dostoyevsky put it best: place man in a completely deterministic universe and he will blow it up, just to prove that he is free. That may be a better analysis of "globalization" which has worked so far only for the rich and privileged and the banks, than singing the glories of a savage capitalism unconcerned with the needs of the poor and the underprivileged.

Emanuel Paparella2016-12-06 13:56:03
P.S. The article above is of course right about the explosion of economic growth resulting from global capitalism, but it appears unconcerned with the eco-social costs of this growth. Half of the world’s 2.2 billion children currently live in poverty, almost a billion people lack access to safe water supplies, about 25 million acres of crop land are lost every year due to soil erosion, and 50% of the world’s non-human species may be extinct by the end of the 21st century. Further, global climate change resulting from “free market” industrial capitalism is threatening to make all these injustices far worse, in addition to other consequences. Perhaps a better alternative needs to be imagined, and soon, before the situation becomes irreparable.

Emanuel Paparella2016-12-07 08:22:19
P.S.S. For those readers despairing of finding an alternative to savage capitalism or globalization pick up any of David Sparenberg's books in the Ovi bookshop, or re-read the following Ovi article by yours truly:


© Copyright CHAMELEON PROJECT Tmi 2005-2008  -  Sitemap  -  Add to favourites  -  Link to Ovi
Privacy Policy  -  Contact  -  RSS Feeds  -  Search  -  Submissions  -  Subscribe  -  About Ovi