Ovi -
we cover every issue
Ovi Bookshop - Free Ebook
Tony Zuvela - Cartoons, Illustrations
Ovi Language
Michael R. Czinkota: As I See It...
The Breast Cancer Site
Murray Hunter: Opportunity, Strategy and Entrepreneurship
International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
BBC News :   - 
iBite :   - 
GAZA: An Inconvenient truth GAZA: An Inconvenient truth
by Murray Hunter
2012-11-19 08:51:58
Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author
DeliciousRedditFacebookDigg! StumbleUpon

GAZA: An Inconvenient truth: The next few days may determine Obama's legacy before his 2nd term begins & whether Clinton will make a run to the presidency in 2016

US President Barak Obama is about to make a well planned trip to Thailand, Burma and Cambodia.

One would suspect that Obama's trip was timed to maximize his exposure to the and start the work to create momentum for his legacy in Asia. However although Obama may return home with a number of planned trade agreements, it will be very difficult for Obama to make any strategic ground with the conservative ASEAN nations he will visit.

It is yet to be seen if the Obama administration really understands the dynamics of the ASEAN region and their reluctance to be dragged into a choice between the US and China.

In fact his trip to Asia is also a risk for him with the decision to visit Burma. If the Thein Sein regime fails to progress and human rights abuses continue to occur with ethnic groups like the Roghani people, this leg of the trip could actually prove to be an embarrassment in the future. The fact that Ang Sang Suu Kyi herself doesn't support fair treatment for these people should ring alarm bells in itself.

There is already concern in some quarters that Obama has sacrificed principles in the interests of attempting to build a new ally to alter the balance of power in the region. This is not the Obama many people voted for.

While Obama is getting ready to leave Washington for South-East Asia with much of his administration already there, it will be very difficult to focus with the job on hand with the Gaza situation unwinding by the hour.

Whether Israel will invade the Gaza strip will depend upon the leadership's real intention; is it to stop the rockets coming out of Gaza or is it to ultimately crush the Hamas leadership? Dogma by Israel suggests the later.  

However this decision will be more a political one rather than a security one, as Israel's support from its allies is currently weak and the Arab landscape since the Arab Spring is a completely different scenario with many unpredictable factors in Egypt, Syria, and even Jordan now exist. Within the last 24 hours the Prime Minister of Egypt and Foreign minister of Tunisia have visited Gaza. One of the members of the Hamas politburo met with the Turkish Prime Minister in Cairo to look at how Turkey can support Gaza.

What is certain that any invasion this time would make Israel alone in the world, except perhaps for the United States which will be in a quandary.

US intelligence gathering ability in the region is at an all time low. Who are really US allies is far from certain. Based on past performance the Netanyahu Government may not listen to the US. Any dealings with Hamas in Gaza may have to go through Egypt, which itself in any Israel invasion of Gaza could be a completely unknown quantity. Any unpredictable event from a desperate Bashar Al Assad in Syria could add to these problems.

So the ability of Obama or Clinton to undertake any form of diplomacy ala the Kissinger days of "shuttle diplomacy" is definitely not on. The events in Libya and Syria has also shown that the Obama administration is extremely cautious even to the point of looking inept and not knowing what to do.

Any invasion of Gaza is going to set back any potential peace process in the Middle East by years, bring world and regional opinion strongly against Israel, and cost the lives of thousands of innocent people. An invasion will probably not result in the wiping out Hamas, but in fact create a whole new generation of even harder line leaders that will replace the deceased martyrs.

But any invasion will also be costly to Obama. If he fails to show the leadership that would be expected of a president of the United states, and appears to do very little, he may be seen by many in the Middle east as an accomplice "after the fact" and spend his second term as a "lame duck" president with little hope of leaving any important foreign policy legacy.

For Clinton, any thinking of running for president in 2016 will very quickly fade from her mind and the perceived failure to "do any deals" would make her cannon fodder on any campaign podium for potential presidential rivals in the future.

Gaza has come for Obama and Clinton at a very inconvenient time.


Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author

Get it off your chest
 (comments policy)

Emanuel Paparella2012-11-19 12:43:39
Indeed, how the latest conflict between Israel and Hamas impacts on the Peace Agreements and perhaps global peace and the legacy and political prospects of President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton remains to be seen.

However there is an ethical dilemma which some may find an inconvenient truth but remains a very timely truth in tandem with the truth that it takes two to fight a war and that in any conflict innocent civilians more often than not die accidentally and that is why wars ought not be entered in lightly.

Such an inconvenient truth was proffered on Sunday by President Obama while in Bangkok to the effect that the militant group Hamas in control of Gaza has it within its power to initiate the resolution of this latest conflict by firing no more missiles into Israeli territory, and that Israel has a right to defend itself from missiles being fired from Gaza onto people’s homes, just as any other nation on earth has.

I don’t believe for a moment that he was thinking of his (or Clinton’s) legacy and political prospects when he made such a statement. It now remains to be seen how Hamas reacts to that inconvenient advise. If it ignores it as it appears and continues to fire missiles unto Israel's civilian population while focusing exclusively on one side of the coin, i.e., the ethical truth that two wrongs do not make a right and therefore the intentional targeting of innocent civilian is always wrong no matter one's grievances, it will have in effect shown plainly its own ethical bankruptcy and will reap what it has been sowing for the last nine months or so.

© Copyright CHAMELEON PROJECT Tmi 2005-2008  -  Sitemap  -  Add to favourites  -  Link to Ovi
Privacy Policy  -  Contact  -  RSS Feeds  -  Search  -  Submissions  -  Subscribe  -  About Ovi