Ovi -
we cover every issue
newsletterNewsletter
subscribeSubscribe
contactContact
searchSearch
Oxterweb  
Ovi Bookshop - Free Ebook
Tony Zuvela - Cartoons, Illustrations
Ovi Language
Ovi on Facebook
Stop violence against women
Tony Zuvela - Cartoons, Illustrations
Stop human trafficking
 
BBC News :   - 
iBite :   - 
GermanGreekEnglishSpanishFinnishFrenchItalianPortugueseSwedish
Art In Politics - W.H. Auden: Poet of the Age of Anxiety Art In Politics - W.H. Auden: Poet of the Age of Anxiety
by Rene Wadlow
2007-12-24 09:45:57
Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author
DeliciousRedditFacebookDigg! StumbleUpon

Wystan Hugh Auden, whose birth 100 years ago in 1907, is marked this year by two separate groups of poetry readers. Each group celebrates half of his poetic life and rather tries to forget about the other half, seeing one part of his life as the perfect image of the modern poet who lost his way.

There is the W.H. Auden (he rarely used his first names) of the 1930s, the English political poet who reported on the Spanish civil war and the start of the Sino-Japanese war in 1939. Then, there is the poet living in the USA during the 1940s who became a US citizen and became primarily concerned with what was called at the time “neo-orthodox Protestant” theology. Finally there is the writer largely of book reviews and short literary essays living much of the time in Italy and Austria until his death in 1973 in Vienna. The one constant running through his life and coloring his more personal writings was a homosexual bonding to men that he hoped would last and never did as reflected in his poem It’s No Use raising a Shout: It’s no use raising a shout.

No, Honey, you can cut that right out.
I don’t want any more hugs;
Make me some fresh tea.

In 1930, shortly after publishing his first book of poems, he went to live in Berlin. The Berlin of Weimar Germany was more tolerant of open homosexuality than was the England of his youth. In Berlin, he began an intensive literary and on-again-off-again sexual relationship with Christopher Isherwood (1904-1986). The two men had known each other slightly at Oxford University. The somewhat older Isherwood was already well introduced in the English publishing and art world. He helped Auden with introductions to editors. It was T.S. Eliot’s publisher Faber & Faber which published Auden on Eliot’s recommendation even if Eliot’s conservative religious and political positions were the opposite of Auden’s.

In Berlin, Auden and Isherwood became aware of social unrest and the clash between the Communists and the rising Nazi party. Auden became a Marxist because Marxism provided a ready-made structure to explain conflict. All his life Auden was interested in developing frameworks to interpret social and religious categories, and the Marxist dialectic was both a philosophy of history and a structure to understand current events. Auden, however, was never attracted to the political parties that were the manifestations of Marxist views.

With Isherwood, Auden wrote a number of verse plays that combined humor, irony with the issues of the day. It was a socially-conscious art but they never departed from a certain ironic tone and a concern with language. Auden was always concerned with the impact of words, and his poems were usually clear and in a conversational style. He could recognize the importance of style and the use of words of other poets.

In the 1930s, confronted with social unrest, William Butler Yeats moved increasingly to the Right even urging “the despotic rule of the educated classes”. In 1933, Yeats was for a short time drawn towards General O’Duffy, leader of the Irish Fascists — the Blue Shirts. Fortunately, O’Duffy was a clown from whom Yeats separated quickly but not from some of O’Duffy’s ‘law and order’ ideas. Thus, although Yeats had become an opponent of Auden’s values, Auden’s tribute to Yeats on his death in 1939 is one of the most moving and just. “ But there is one field in which the poet is a man of action, the field of language, and it is precisely in this that the greatness of the deceased is most obviously shown. However false or undemocratic his ideas, his diction shows a continuous evolution toward what one might call the true democratic style. The social virtues of real democracy are brotherhood and intelligence, and the parallel linguistic virtues are strength and clarity, virtues which appear even more clearly through successive volumes by the deceased.”

When the Spanish civil war broke out, Auden was immediately drawn to the Republican cause. He went to Spain thinking of becoming an ambulance driver. However, his literary talents were more needed in the information and propaganda services. In Spain, he saw that the political realities were more ambiguous and troubling than he thought, but he saw that war was ready to expand. He also saw the link between events in Europe and Asia. In 1938, Auden and Isherwood went to China to cover the Sino-Japanese conflict and jointly wrote a powerful account Journey to a War.

On their way back by boat from China, Auden and Isherwood decided to stay in the USA. Auden in New Year Letter reviews the political decade in which he had been the leading poetry voice of the Left:

Who, thinking of the last ten years
Does not hear howling in his ears
The Asiatic cry of pain
The shots of executing Spain
See stumbling through his outraged mind
The Abyssinians, blistered, blind,
The dazed uncomprehending stare
Of the Danubian despair
The Jew wrecked in the German cell,
Flat Poland frozen into hell.


Once in the USA, the Auden-Isherwood couple broke. Auden wrote:

If equal affection cannot be
Let the more loving one be me.

Isherwood moved to California and became part of the religious-mystical circle around Aldous Huxley and Gerald Heard. Isherwood became a disciple of the Indian teacher Swami Prabhavananda and cooperated in the translations of a number of Indian religious texts. Later Isherwood’s memories of Berlin Goodbye to Berlin served as the basis of plays and films.

Meanwhile, Auden stayed on the East Coast, first teaching at Swarthmore, a Quaker college near Philadelphia from 1942 -45; he then lived in New York City in the literary fashionable St Marks Place. He began writing for US journals, in particular The New Yorker and Vogue both of which paid well so that he could write without having a regular teaching job, though he was often asked to give lectures at universities. Auden became increasingly influenced by the Protestant theologian and political analyst Reinhold Niebuhr who was teaching in New York City. Niebuhr combined a socialist-leaning politics with a Protestant theology which stressed that humans were always limited in their ability to do good by the reality of sin, which is self-centeredness. In the Niebuhr spirit, Auden wrote “Man is not, as the romantics imagined, good by nature. Men are equal not in their capacities and virtues but in their natural bias toward evil. No individual or class therefore can claim an absolute right to impose its view of good upon them. Government must be democratic, the people must have a right to make their own mistakes and to suffer for them.”

In New York, Auden entered into a long-term literary and homosexual relationship with Chester Kallman, a younger poet and writer. The two together began writing opera libretti for the English composer Benjamin Britten, who also spent the war years in the USA. They wrote together the words for Britten’s opera Paul Bunyan – a folk hero that Britten used to deal with his newly-discovered American themes, as well as the words for many of Britten’s song cycles. Kallman and Auden wrote Rake’s Progress for Igor Stravinsky who had also moved to the USA as well as an opera of Hans Henze based on The Bacchae of Euripides.

To mark the war years and the start of the Cold War, Auden wrote The Age of Anxiety which won the Pulitzer Prize for poetry in 1947. While the book was not that widely read, the title gave its name to a whole period and sections of it were often quoted.

By 1948, Auden was again attracted to life in Europe but largely places that were not associated in his mind with his experiences of the 1930s. He spent part of each year in Italy and later both Italy and Austria. He returned to Oxford University to give some lectures on poetry, but post-war England held out few attractions for him. Although he continued writing book reviews and short essays, his declining years never caught the spirit of the times as did his 1930s poems and his 1947 The Age of Anxiety. Nevertheless, his work merits being known, a voice of a time past;

-----
A useful biography is Humphrey Carpenter W.H. Auden: A Biography (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1981).
His plays and dramatic writings with Christopher Isherwood are presented by Edward Mendelson (Ed.) W.H. Auden and Christopher Isherwood. Plays and other dramatic writing, 1928-1938 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988).

For his religiously-inspired writings in the USA see Arthur Kirsch Auden and Christianity (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005)

Click here to download 'Art in Politics' theme PDF

* * * * * *

'Art in Politics' includes:

Poetry by Mbizo Chirasha & Alexander Mikhaylov
Artwork by Sarah Beetson, Steve Cartwright & Jan Sand
Articles and essays by Asa Butcher, Thanos Kalamidas, Emanuel L. Paparella & Rene Wadlow

 


    
Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author

Comments(3)
Get it off your chest
Name:
Comment:
 (comments policy)

Emanuel Paparella2007-12-24 11:43:13
“ But there is one field in which the poet is a man of action, the field of language, and it is precisely in this that the greatness of the deceased is most obviously shown... ”

Were one to reduce to an essential sentence a recent commemorative celebration at Yale University (for his 100th anniversary of W.H. Auden birth) it would probably be this: the reason some critics consider Auden the greatest of 20th century poets is that he saw the defense of language as the most important political duty of a poet. As he put it: “if language is corrupted thought is corrupted, and speech is the mother, not the handmaiden, of thought.” He also saw writing as “our best means of breaking bread with the dead. Without that communication with the dead, human life is impossible, not worth living.”

However, at times Auden, consummate poet that he was, was able to see the other darker side of the coin and also lamented the writer’s inability to effect change: “All the verses I wrote in the thirties didn’t save a single Jew. Europe’s social and political history would be the same if Dante, Shakespeare and Goethe had never written. The only people effecting political change are journalists who try to produce the truth, and writers in countries where there is no freedom.” (continued below)


Emanuel Paparella2007-12-24 11:45:22
There is another constant in Auden and it is the longing for the unattainable:

“For the error bred in the bone
Of each woman and each man
Craves what it cannot have
Not universal love
But to be loved alone.”

Almost as a commentary to the above poem Auden said, after coming under the influence of Kierkegaard, Charles Williams and C.S. Lewis, that “After a labyrinth of false moves and losses, you come at least to the place you know is for you. I am not mystical. But I’ve had encounters with numinous objects. And all of poetry depends on it. What are all the acts and diversions of people—races, football, clumsy acts of love, but the pitiful maimed expression of that intense passion, the positive tropism of the soul for God?” And here is how Auden describes that tropism:

“In our anguish we struggle
To elude Him, to lie to Him
Yet His love observes His
appalling promise.
His predilection, as we
wander and weep
Is with us to the end,
Minding our meanings.
Our least matter dear to Him.”

To my mind, the poem by Auden that best voices the anxiety of 20th century modern man, which is also the anxiety of Dante lost in the woods, is this:

“Lest we should see where we
are Lost in a haunted wood
Children afraid of the night
Who have never been
happy or good.”

But then he concludes:

“We must love one another or die.”


Sand2007-12-24 15:01:05
There is much talk of love in this season that all humans should love each other but we should look around us at the world. There are men kidnapping children and training them to be killers, there are men entrapping others to become dependent upon narcotics and becoming rich in the process, there are men raping and slaughtering women and children for no sensible reason. There are powerful men producing medical drugs and denying them to needy sick people in order that they become wealthier. There are men watching the world becoming poisoned because of their industries but continue because it is profitable. There are men trusted to care for their constituents who made them powerful and these men use the power to enrich themselves and destroy their constituents. There are men who care nothing but for themselves and their families and would destroy everybody else to maintain their superior position. Am I supposed to love these human monsters? Or would it be better to dispense with both love and hatred and seek dispassionately to understanding as to how they are permitted to continue in these horrible activities and to rearrange the world without emotion to see to it that people and what sustains people are made for all people and not just those who are destroying the world?


© Copyright CHAMELEON PROJECT Tmi 2005-2008  -  Sitemap  -  Add to favourites  -  Link to Ovi
Privacy Policy  -  Contact  -  RSS Feeds  -  Search  -  Submissions  -  Subscribe  -  About Ovi