Ovi -
we cover every issue
Apopseis magazine  
Ovi Bookshop - Free Ebook
Ovi Greece
Ovi Language
Murray Hunter: Essential Oils: Art, Agriculture, Science, Industry and Entrepreneurship
Stop violence against women
Murray Hunter: Opportunity, Strategy and Entrepreneurship
International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
BBC News :   - 
iBite :   - 
The Trump Train is already heading towards Europe
by Ovi Magazine Guest
2016-11-14 09:39:47
Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author
DeliciousRedditFacebookDigg! StumbleUpon

The Trump Train is already heading towards Europe
Daniele Scalea

The “Trump Train” (once a Twitter hashtag and then a successful metaphor of the assertive, and to date unstoppable, reform wind blown by Donald Trump) is finally arrived at the White House. But this is very likely not the final destination of its journey. The Trump Train could soon arrive in Europe.

an001_400And it would be a return trip. As Donald Trump frequently referred to, his campaign owes a lot of inspiration from the Brexit movement. Surely Trump got in politics well before, but after June he's started referring to his rise as a “Brexit plus plus plus”. And it wasn't just a motivational motto.

The Trumpist and Brexiteer final arguments strictly resemble one another: a proudly nationalistic rebuttal of adverse fallouts of globalization, from industrial outsourcing to the (West)self-hating ideology of extreme multiculturalism. The Trump Train and the Brexit share also a common grass-roots social base of support, which are the White working and middle classes of small cities and rural areas especially.

Even if US society is still very different from the European one, the rampant globalization of last decades has made them quite close compared to half a century ago. Both US and Europe has experienced massive deindustrialization with a geographical concentration of the remaining high-tech industries in a few islands of happiness – few compared to the many rust belts of the Western world. Both US and Europe has seen a deep financialization of their economies. Both US and Europe has been overwhelmed by the new ideology of the so-called politically correct, a post-modern, constructivist, relativist and anti-Western set of theories and practices. It's true: in the US you can find also the Bible Belt, but if we consider the European Union as a whole, we could see a Catholic Belt in its Eastern countries, opposed to Sweden (a European California) or London and Paris (European New Yorks) or in general the more liberal Western countries. Exactly as in the US, also in Europe the post-modernism is currently hegemonic in colleges and mainstream media, which are trying to inculcate it also in the common man, and the common woman - and the common *... Finally, the massive immigration flows of last decades in Europe are making her society more and more resembles the composite ethnic mix of North American society.

In so similar environments, it is predictable to find similar political trends and demands. Brexit- and Trump-alike movements are in high gear throughout Europe, with very few notable exceptions (as Spain, but maybe only because the Partido Popular is quite more right-wing than its conservative counterparts in other countries). The working class vote has yet largely migrated from the Left to the Right, whereas the upper class is now proudly leftist in majority. Larger cities are the liberal strongholds while the suburbs are swarmed by Brexiteer-style so-called “populists”.

You have read in every possible way how Trump prevail among White electorate by 60%-40%, losing among Blacks (10%-90%) and Hispanics (35%-65%). Surely we cannot trust too much pollsters's statistics, but they are perfectly in line with surveys in previous elections. Now, take the Brexit vote: white voters chose Leave by a notable (and indeed determining the final result) margin of 53%-47%, which would be ever wider if it was not for the Scotland and Northern Ireland's white voters, who had very particular and local-specific reason for prefering Remain. Anyway, they were not Scots or Irish the ethnic groups that by a larger majority voted for remain in the European Union. They were Asians (65%-35%), Muslims (70%-30%) and Blacks (75%-25%) instead.

No wonder if, looking into the foreign-born voters in Europe, or also second- and third-generation immigrants, we will find a clear support for the Left. And since those groups are now numerically very considerable in many countries, they can actually determine the outcome of an European election. Precisely as Blacks and Hispanics in the US have been decisive in the elections of Presidents Kennedy, Carter, Clinton and Obama, all with minor approval among Whites. Prompting White voters to move rightwards

With all these similarities in place, it becomes very likely for Europe to follow on the path already taken by US politics. Bets are open on which major European country will be the first stop of the Trump Train.


an002Daniele Scalea, geopolitical analyst, is Director-general of IsAG (Rome Institute of Geopolitics) and Ph.D. Candidate in Political studies at the Sapienza University, Rome. Author of three books, is frequent contributor and columnist to various Tv-channels and newspapers.

Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author

Get it off your chest
 (comments policy)

Emanuel Paparella2016-11-14 11:20:38
Interesting metaphor: the unstoppable train spewing pollution into the air arriving in Europe at the station called “change and inevitable progress within globalization” a staple of the EU political diet for the last twenty years or so. It is the same metaphor used at the opening ceremony of the London Olympics recently. After all, the train made possible the Industrial revolution and the British Empire for which the English still wax nostalgic.

But I am afraid it is the wrong metaphor. Matthew Arnold, would have been the first to observe that what makes a nation great is not its coal or oil or its trains but its poets and philosophers. In other words, he would have pointed out the tremendous philosophical fallacy of positivism within modernity which declares what arrives at the end as inevitable progress.

As I pointed out in my “post mortem” article on the US election, in the Italy after the unification which arrived at the end of a 300 + year process announced by Machiavelli, things not only did not get better but got worse, to the point that my own grandfather and one million others in the same predicament had to emigrate to America. I am afraid that not everything that arrives as the end is necessarily for the better. Consider the disaster of the Weimar Republic in 1932 when it elected Hitler as Chancellor because he was going to make Germany great again. So, the Europeans and the English in particular are being clever by half; they would be wiser, it seems to me, to discard the misguided train’s metaphor and consider the alarm bell of a Matthew Arnold or the historical lesson of Italian unification. As mentioned, in the novel Il Gattopardo, Tancredi, who has fought with Garibaldi for unification, tells his uncle, the prince of Salina: “We need to change everything so that nothing changes.” That metaphor of Mr. Scalea of the train is redolent of those prescient and insightful words of Tancredi. On both sides of the Atlantic we, the people, who have been stiffed by the likes of Trump (who pays no taxes) and globalization for the last thirty years or so, will be given the illusion that everything is changing, but in reality nothing will change. Time will confirm it in the future but the past is already indicative of what is about to go down.

© Copyright CHAMELEON PROJECT Tmi 2005-2008  -  Sitemap  -  Add to favourites  -  Link to Ovi
Privacy Policy  -  Contact  -  RSS Feeds  -  Search  -  Submissions  -  Subscribe  -  About Ovi