Ovi -
we cover every issue
newsletterNewsletter
subscribeSubscribe
contactContact
searchSearch
Poverty - Homeless  
Ovi Bookshop - Free Ebook
Stop human trafficking
Ovi Language
Books by Avgi Meleti
WordsPlease - Inspiring the young to learn
Tony Zuvela - Cartoons, Illustrations
International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
 
BBC News :   - 
iBite :   - 
GermanGreekEnglishSpanishFinnishFrenchItalianPortugueseSwedish
Lithuanian report Lithuanian report
by Euro Reporter
2014-10-30 11:51:46
Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author
DeliciousRedditFacebookDigg! StumbleUpon

Lithuania Offers Example of How to Break Russia’s Grip on Energy

The vast ship that eased into this misty seaport early on Monday was hailed by American and European officials as the strongest signal that the stranglehold Russia has on the Baltics and their energy needs can be broken. The vessel, the Independence, is a floating factory for converting liquefied natural gas into the burnable variety. It represents a direct challenge to the Russian way of doing business as many other countries in the European Union have dithered over how to deal with President Vladimir V. Putin and his attempts to reassert Russian influence over parts of the former Soviet empire like Ukraine. “We are now an energy-secure state,” Dalia Grybauskaite, the Lithuanian president, said at a ceremony that featured martial touches like a naval brass band, red flares and a cannon salute. “Nobody else from now on will be able to dictate to us the price of gas, or to buy our political will, or to bribe our politicians.”

“If we don’t like it, we can drop it fully and totally,” Ms. Grybauskaite said, referring to a possible severing of relations with Gazprom, the government-controlled Russian gas exporter, which supplies all of Lithuania’s gas. For Lithuania, which is just slightly larger than West Virginia, the floating terminal — a faster and generally cheaper option than building a terminal on land — is a big step toward energy independence from Russia. Europe has long declared such independence to be its goal, but has done little to achieve it. That makes Lithuania’s efforts to break free of Gazprom a significant example of how even countries that are bound by geography and history to Russia’s energy behemoth can find alternatives. “This was done because the government of Lithuania wanted to make this happen,” Amos J. Hochstein, acting special envoy for international energy affairs at the State Department, told a gas conference here on Monday. “This needs to be the inspiration for the rest of Europe,” said Mr. Hochstein, who urged the European Union to approve a short list of strategic infrastructure projects intended to improve its energy security. The American focus on the issue began in late 2008, when the government contributed more than $800,000 to Lithuania to help develop technical specifications for a liquefied natural gas terminal to provide “increased flexibility and competition” for the country.

The Lithuanian government gave final approval for the project in 2010. Ms. Grybauskaite, who previously said that local companies and lawmakers with links to Gazprom and other Russian businesses meddled in the liquefied natural gas project, said on Monday that more energy independence could have been achieved sooner had there been greater political will in Lithuania. Lithuanian officials say they had already pushed Russia into bargaining — something it has long resisted — when Gazprom cut its gas prices by about 20 percent in May. “Consumers are already feeling lower prices of gas” as “a natural outcome of our terminal construction,” Rokas Masiulis, the Lithuanian energy minister, told reporters on Monday. The price that Lithuania was paying for liquefied natural gas was in “a very similar range” to the lower Gazprom price, he said. The first shipment of liquefied natural gas, set to arrive on Tuesday from the Norwegian company Statoil, is equivalent to 60 million cubic meters of natural gas. Further shipments from Statoil should reach the equivalent of 540 million cubic meters annually in the next five years. That is a fifth of Lithuania’s needs. Lithuania says the terminal, the only operation of its kind in the region, could become a beachhead to supply most of the needs of the other two Baltic states, Latvia and Estonia, which also rely on Russia for gas.

Even so, the company managing the project, Klaipedos Nafta, the state-controlled oil terminal operator, has not yet sold the majority of the liquefied natural gas terminal’s capacity — one of the factors that raise the important question of whether the terminal makes economic as well as political sense. “Next year will show very real interest for the terminal,” said Mr. Masiulis, the energy minister. Another challenge for the project would be if Gazprom dropped prices to Lithuania to the point that running the terminal became uneconomical. Gazprom shrugged off the arrival of the vessel. “If Lithuanian consumers are willing to pay more to reduce their dependence, it’s their business,” a spokesman, Sergei Kupriyanov, said by email. The vessel was built in South Korea for the Norwegian company Hoegh, which is leasing it to Klaipedos Nafta under an arrangement that gives the Lithuanians the right to buy it after a decade. Lithuania is spending 448 million euros, or $568 million, for construction, maintenance and a 10-year lease on the floating terminal, including financing for state-backed loans, said Mantas Bartuska, the chief executive of Klaipedos Nafta.

The vessel, which is three soccer fields in length and formally known as a floating gas storage and regasification unit, could not have been more timely for Lithuanians. The country of about three million people was the first former Soviet republic to reclaim its political independence. This year, Lithuania received approval to join the eurozone on Jan. 1, 2015. But it has waited 25 years to regain some control over its energy, which is a major expense for Lithuanian households and businesses. In the past, Lithuania paid more than its Baltic neighbors for Russian gas. Lithuania also says it feels more exposed than Latvia, which has gas storage facilities, and Estonia, which has shale oil resources. Gazprom had an ownership stake in Lithuania’s natural gas distribution network until this summer and part of Lithuania’s electrical infrastructure is still controlled from Moscow. Before the arrival of the vessel, Lithuanian commentators warned of the potential for Russian sabotage, and parts of the port were locked down Monday for its arrival. Linas Linkevicius, the Lithuanian foreign minister, suggested on his Twitter account on Oct. 19 that reports of a lost submarine in Swedish waters represented a “weird coincidence” when the liquefied natural gas vessel was crossing the Baltic Sea. Lithuanians continue to complain that the West has underestimated the dangers posed by Russia, which has an enclave in Kaliningrad, on the border with Lithuania, where Russia keeps a naval base. For analysts like Jonathan Stern of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, the project comes at the right time for Lithuania, partly because liquefied natural gas prices are expected to ease over the next two years. “One of the most interesting questions is when the long-term contracts run out in Lithuania next year,” Mr. Stern said, referring to Gazprom’s sales agreements. “Will the Lithuanians say they do not want to extend the contracts” because it is “geopolitically unacceptable to depend on Russian gas at all?”

********************************************************************

Lithuania declares energy independence with offshore gas terminal

Lithuania has received it’s long awaited offshore liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal. The vessel’s name: independence. Anchoring in the former Soviet Republic the aim is to end the country’s dependency on Russian gas giant Gazprom which is the country’s sole supplier. Vlinius says its pay the highest price for gas in the EU.

Lithuania’s president says the new sources of gas will give them leverage in negotiating better prices with Gazprom. Until 2009, Lithuania was dependent on a Chernobyl-style nuclear reactor, but it was closed as a condition of joining the EU, and unlike neighbouring Latvia it has no LNG storage capacity.

Three years of construction and more than 100 million euros later, the vessel could eventually supply up to 80 percent of the Baltic region’s demands. Without the terminal, Lithuania would survive 4-5 days without Russian gas. Now its gas can be shipped from Norway and the US.

********************************************************************

Lithuania's ministry plans internet for everyone

ithuanian Ministry of Transport and Communications has Lithuania prepared the New Generation Access Network Plan for 2014-2020, which in terms of state intervention will provide the basic new generation broadband infrastructure in areas where no adequate broadband infrastructure was available before, the ministry said in a report

"During the implementation period, we will deploy the basic broadband infrastructure such as fiber-optic lines and telecommunication towers i.e. invest in infrastructure rather than directly in services. In order to make this investment economically feasible and avoid possible duplication of existing lines, Lithuanian authorities consulted with the major communication operators and adjusted the routes and locations," said Tomas Karpavicius, chancellor of the ministry.

The New Generation Access Network plan will stimulate infrastructure-based competition. The aim of the national plan is to reach the goal of EU initiative on Digital Agenda and, by 2020, provide all Lithuanian residents a 30 Mbps or above internet speed connection. Karpavicius underlined that, contrary to mistakenly assumed idea, the goal of the national plan is not to fully cover the territory, but provide access to broadband services to all households. In order to implement the national plan, it is planned to build fiber-optic lines, and, in the areas with few people or distant households, telecommunication towers. State will not complete with commercial operators; therefore, all telecommunication operators will be able to use the provided infrastructure on equal terms.

 


       
Print - Comment - Send to a Friend - More from this Author

Comments(0)
Get it off your chest
Name:
Comment:
 (comments policy)

© Copyright CHAMELEON PROJECT Tmi 2005-2008  -  Sitemap  -  Add to favourites  -  Link to Ovi
Privacy Policy  -  Contact  -  RSS Feeds  -  Search  -  Submissions  -  Subscribe  -  About Ovi